About people in need - eye on Cuba project
Eye on Cuba is a specialized platform dedicated to monitoring and documenting human rights violations in Cuba. Its primary objective is to inform the international community about abuses committed by Cuban state institutions. Furthermore, it seeks to rigorously shed light on the current human rights situation, enabling a clearer and more structured understanding of the national landscape. This effort is particularly significant in a country where access to reliable data is limited and institutional transparency is scarce.
How to use the map.
Eye on Cuba's interactive map allows users to explore documented cases of human rights violations across the country. Cases can be filtered by type of violation, geographic location, date, and other relevant categories. This tool facilitates the visualization of patterns and trends, offering an accessible way to understand the scale and distribution of reported abuses.
About the data.
The data presented on Eye on Cuba is derived from verified documentation collected by local activists and human rights observers. Each case is carefully reviewed to ensure accuracy and credibility before being published on the platform. The database includes detailed information on the nature of the violations, the institutions involved, and the geographic and temporal context. This rigorous approach allows for the identification of patterns and trends, contributing to a deeper understanding of the human rights landscape in Cuba.
Who contributes.
Eye on Cuba relies on the work of local activists, human rights defenders, and independent organizations operating both within and outside of Cuba. These contributors document cases on the ground—often in high-risk environments—and provide verified information that feeds into the platform’s database. Their efforts are essential to ensuring the credibility, depth, and reach of the monitoring process.
Methodology.
Eye on Cuba's methodology is based on the systematic collection of information through networks of local activists and independent observers. Each reported case undergoes a verification process to ensure the reliability of the data before publication. The information is then categorized according to criteria such as type of violation, location, date, and responsible institution. This approach enables comparative analysis and the identification of relevant patterns over time.
Contributing Partners
